ABSTRACT
AIM: To compare the differences in the efficacy and safety of combination of intravitreal dexamethasone(Ozurdex)and ranibizumab or monotherapy of ranibizumab in eyes with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion(RVO-ME).METHODS: Patients diagnosed with non-ischemic RVO-ME by fluorescein fundus angiography in our hospital from June 2020 to December 2022 were selected. All patients were initially treated with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab(0.5 mg), and 42 patients(42 eyes)who had central retinal thickness(CRT)≥300 μm after 2 wk were included. They were randomly divided into combined treatment group and monotherapy group. The combined treatment group(21 eyes)received Ozurdex intravitreal injection immediately, while the monotherapy group(21 eyes)was treated with ranibizumab intravitreal injection by 3+pro re nata(PRN). The changes of best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), CRT, and intraocular pressure before and at 2 wk, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 mo after treatment were recorded, and the ocular or systemic complications were observed.RESULTS:The BCVA and CRT of all patients at 2 wk, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 mo after treatment were significantly better than those before treatment(all P<0.01). There were statistical significance in the BCVA and CRT between two groups at 2 and 3 mo after treatment(all P<0.05). The most significant increase of BCVA in the combined treatment group occurred at 2 mo after treatment. The mean recurrence time of macular edema in the monotherapy group was 1.45±0.53 mo, with 4.21±0.78 injection times of ranibizumab. None of the patients showed serious complications after treatment. The most common complications in the combined treatment group were subconjunctival hemorrhage and elevated intraocular pressure, which were manageable with topical ocular hypotensive agents, and no patient required antiglaucoma or cataract surgery.CONCLUSION: Compared with monotherapy of ranibizumab, intravitreal injection of dexamethasone combined with ranibizumab can significantly improve the visual acuity and effectively reduce the macular edema in the treatment of RVO-ME, with a long duration of efficacy and less intravitreal injection of drugs.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Staphylococcus hominis (S. hominis) is a coagulase-negative Staphylococci and an infrequent cause of endophthalmitis. Due to its ability to produce biofilm, especially in diabetic patients, strains may acquire antibiotic resistance. We present two cases of S. hominis endophthalmitis, one with acute endophthalmitis after intravitreal bevacizumab injection and one with chronic endophthalmitis following undiagnosed penetrating ocular trauma. Although there are only four published S. hominis endophthalmitis cases in the literature, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no previously published case after intravitreal bevacizumab.
RESUMO Staphylococcus hominis (S. hominis) é um estafilococo coagulase-negativo e uma causa pouco frequente de endoftalmite. Devido à sua capacidade de produzir biofilme, especialmente em pacientes diabéticos, cepas dessa bactéria podem adquirir resistência a antibióticos. Este relato apresenta dois casos de endoftalmite por S. hominis: um de endoftalmite aguda após injeção intravítrea de bevacizumabe e outro de endoftalmite crônica após trauma ocular penetrante não diagnosticado. Embora existam apenas quatro casos de endoftalmite por S. hominis publicados na literatura, até onde sabemos não houve nenhum caso publicado anteriormente após bevacizumabe intravítreo.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation to Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation for secondary glaucoma following silicone oil removal. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 43 vitrectomized pseudophakic eyes with persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal. Patients were randomized to either viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation or Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. All patients were examined on day 1, week 1, and months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 postoperatively. Postoperative complications were noted. Success was defined as an intraocular pressure between 6 and 20 mmHg and with an intraocular pressure reduction of >30% compared with the preoperative intraocular pressure. Results: There were 22 eyes in the viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation and 21 eyes in the Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation group. The mean preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure in the viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation groups were 35.5 ± 2.6 mmHg and 35.5 ± 2.4 mmHg and 16.9 ± 0.7 mmHg and 17.9 ± 0.9 mmHg respectively (p˂0.0001). There was a statistically significant intraocular pressure reduction at all follow-up time points compared to preoperative values (p˂0.0001) in both groups. The unqualified success rate in the viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation groups were 72.73% and 61.9%, respectively. A minimal self-limited hyphema was the most common complication. Conclusions: Both viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation are effective in lowering the intraocular pressure in glaucoma after silicone oil removal with viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation providing greater reduction, higher success rates, and minimal complications.
RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior com o implante de válvula de glaucoma de Ahmed para glaucoma secundário após remoção de óleo de silicone. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo prospectivo de 43 olhos pseudofácicos vitrectomizados com glaucoma persistente após a remoção de óleo de silicone. Os pacientes foram randomizados para viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior ou implante de válvula de Ahmed. Todos os pacientes foram examinados no primeiro dia, na primeira semana e 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 e 24 meses após a cirurgia. Observaram-se complicações pós-operatórias. O sucesso foi definido como uma pressão intraocular entre 6 e 20 mmHg e uma redução da pressão intraocular >30% em comparação com a pressão intraocular pré-operatória. Resultados: Foram designados 22 olhos para o grupo da viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior e 21 olhos para o grupo do implante de válvula de Ahmed. A pressão intraocular média pré-operatória foi de 35,5 ± 2,6 mmHg para o grupo da viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior e pós- e de 35,5 ± 2,4 mmHg no grupo do implante de válvula de Ahmed. e Os valores pós-operatórios foram de 16,9 ± 0,7 mmHg e 17,9 ± 0,9 mmHg para esses mesmos grupos, respectivamente (p<0,0001). Ambos os grupos tiveram uma redução estatisticamente significativa da pressão intraocular em relação aos valores pré-operatórios (p<0,0001) em todos os momentos do acompanhamento. A taxa de sucesso não qualificado nos grupos da viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior e do implante de válvula de Ahmed foi de 72,73% e 61,9%, respectivamente. A complicação mais comum foi o hifema, autolimitado e mínimo. Conclusões: Tanto a viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior quanto o implante de válvula de Ahmed são eficazes na redução da pressão intraocular no glaucoma após injeção de óleo de silicone, mas a viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação em câmara anterior proporcionou maior redução da pressão intraocular e maiores taxas de sucesso, com complicações mínimas.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the visual gain following pars plana vitrectomy for vitreous hemorrhage in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 172 eyes of 143 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus between January 2012 and January 2018. Demographic data, ophthalmological findings, surgery details, and visual outcomes were gathered after consulting the patients' records. The main outcome measured was the improvement of best corrected visual acuity and the secondary outcomes measured were rebleeding and complications. Results: Best corrected visual acuity improved in 103 eyes (59.88%), worsened in 45 eyes (26.16%), and remained unchanged in 24 eyes (13.95%). Type 2 diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with better final best corrected visual acuity (p=0.0244). Previous treatment by pan-retinal laser photocoagulation or intravitreal bevacizumab determined better final best corrected visual acuity, but not significantly (p>0.05). Preoperative rubeosis iridis and neovascular glaucoma did not influence the outcomes. The lack of fibrovascular proliferation requiring dissection was a significant factor for better final best corrected visual acuity (p=0.0006). Rebleeding occurred in 37.1% of the eyes and it was not influenced by the antiplatelet drugs (p>0.05). Postoperative neovascular glaucoma was a negative prognostic factor (p=0.0037). Conclusion: The final best corrected visual acuity was influenced positively by type 2 diabetes mellitus and the absence of preoperative extensive fibrovascular proliferation and negatively by postoperative neovascular glaucoma.
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar os fatores que influenciam o ganho visual após vitrectomia via pars plana para hemorragia vítrea em pacientes com retinopatia diabética proliferativa. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo retrospectivo de 172 olhos de 143 pacientes consecutivos com diabetes mellitus entre janeiro de 2012 e janeiro de 2018. Dados demográficos, achados oftalmológicos, detalhes da cirurgia e resultados visuais foram coletados através de consulta aos prontuários dos pacientes. A principal medida de desfecho foi o aumento da melhor acuidade visual corrigida e as medidas de desfecho secundário foram a recidiva da hemorragia e a ocorrência de complicações. Resultados: A melhor acuidade visual corrigida aumentou em 103 olhos (59,88%), diminuiu em 45 olhos (26,16%) e permaneceu inalterada em 24 olhos (13,95%). O diabetes mellitus tipo 2 foi significativamente associado a maiores valores finais da melhor acuidade visual corrigida (p=0,0244). O tratamento prévio por fotocoagulação panretiniana com laser ou bevacizumabe intravítreo determinou maiores valores da melhor acuidade visual final corrigida, mas não significativamente (p>0,05). A presença de rubeose iridiana pré-operatória ou de glaucoma neovascular não influenciou os desfechos. A ausência de proliferação fibrovascular com necessidade de dissecção foi um fator significativo para maiores valores da melhor acuidade visual final corrigida (p=0,0006). Ocorreu recidiva da hemorragia em 37,1% dos olhos e não foi influenciada por fármacos antiplaquetários (p>0,05). O glaucoma neovascular pós-operatório foi um fator prognóstico negativo (p=0,0037). Conclusão: O resultado final da melhor acuidade visual corrigida foi influenciado positivamente pelo diabetes mellitus tipo 2 e pela ausência de proliferação fibrovascular extensa no pré-operatório, e negativamente pela ocorrência de glaucoma neovascular pós-operatório.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose: Since particles are released in syringes during intravitreal injections, we assessed them quantitatively after agitating syringes commonly used for intravitreal injections. Methods: With and without agitation, the SR 1-ml insulin, Becton-Dickinson Ultra-Fine 0.3-ml Short Needle with a half-unit scale, HSW Norm-Ject Tuberculin, and Becton-Dickinson 1-ml Luer Lok Tip were examined with buffer and bevacizumab, aflibercept, and ziv-aflibercept. Flow imaging microscopy was performed to assess the particle numbers, concentrations, morphology, and size distribution. Results: Using the Becton-Dickinson Ultra-Fine syringe, the average particle count after agitation was higher than in the no-agitation group. For particles greater than 10 and 25 µm, differences were observed using the SR syringe between the two studied conditions. There were no significant differences in the means for the other syringes. Without agitation, the SR syringe had the highest number of particles (2,417,361.7 ± 3,421,575.5) followed by the Becton-Dickinson Ultra-Fine with 812.530,9 ± 996.187,2. The Becton-Dickinson Luer Lok Tip and HSW Norm-Ject performed equally with 398,396.8 ± 484,239.2 and 416,016.4 ± 242,650.1 particles, respectively. Conclusions: Flicking syringes to eliminate air bubbles results in increased numbers of particles released during intravitreal injections into the human vitreous.
RESUMO Objetivo: Visto que partículas são liberadas nas seringas durante as injeções intravítreas (IVIs), estas foram avaliadas quantitativamente após a agitação das seringas mais comumente usadas para injeções intravítreas. Métodos: A seringa SR de 1 ml de insulina, a agulha curta Becton-Dickinson Ultra-Fine 0,3 ml com escala de meia unidade, HSW Norm-Ject Tuberculin e a Becton-Dickinson Luer Lok Tip de 1 ml foram estudadas com placedo e com bevacizumabe, aflibercept e ziv-aflibercept, com e sem agitação. MicroFlow Imaging Microscopy foi realizada para avaliar o número de partículas, concentração, morfologia e distribuição das mesmas por tamanho. Resultados: A contagem média de partículas após agitação foi maior do que no grupo sem agitação usando a seringa Becton-Dickinson Ultra-Fine. Diferenças foram observadas usando a seringa SR entre as duas condições estudadas para partículas maiores que 10 e 25 µm. Para as demais seringas, não foram observadas diferenças significativas nas médias. A seringa SR apresentou o maior número de partículas sem agitação (2.417.361,7 ± 3.421.575,5) seguida da Becton-Dickinson Ultra-Fine com 812.530,9 ± 996.187,2. A BD Luer Lok Tip e a HSW Norm-Ject se comportaram de forma semelhante com 398.396,8 ± 484.239,2 e 416.016,4 ± 242.650,1 partículas, respectivamente. Conclusões: Agitar seringas para remover bolhas de ar resulta em um maior número de partículas liberadas durante Becton-Dickinson no vítreo humano.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To investigate the efficacy of micropulse laser combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in the treatment of macular edema(ME)secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion(BRVO).METHODS: A total of 200 cases(200 eyes)of non-ischemic BRVO secondary to ME who were treated in our hospital from January 2020 to March 2022 were selected and divided into the control group(100 cases, 100 eyes)and the observation group(100 cases, 100 eyes)by random number table. The control group was given intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, and the observation group was given micropulse laser combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab. The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), central macular thickness(CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness(SFCT), total number of injections, macular leakage and complications were compared between two groups.RESULTS: After treatment, the BCVA of the two groups were improved, and the BCVA of the observation group was better than those in the control group at 1, 3, 6 and 12mo after treatment(all P&#x003C;0.05). After treatment, the CMT and SFCT of the two groups decreased, and the CMT and SFCT of the observation group was lower than those in the control group at 1, 3, 6 and 12mo after treatment(all P&#x003C;0.05). The total number of injections in the observation group during the treatment period was less than that in the control group [(4.06±1.12)times vs.(5.32±1.15)times](t=5.852, P&#x003C;0.001). The leakage rates of the control group and the observation group after 12mo of treatment were 69.0% and 27.0% respectively, with statistical significance between the two groups(χ2=35.337, P&#x003C;0.001). The incidence of complications in the control group and observation group were 11.0% and 5.0% respectively, with no statistical significance between the two groups(χ2=2.446, P=0.118).CONCLUSION: Micropulse laser combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab has a significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of ME secondary to non-ischemic BRVO, which is safe and can improve patients' vision and ME, reduce the total doses of ranibizumab without increasing the incidence of complications.
ABSTRACT
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most threatening complication of diabetic retinopathy that affects visual function, which is characterized by intractability and recurrent attacks. Currently, the clinical routine treatments for DME mainly include intravitreal injection, grid laser photocoagulation in the macular area, subthreshold micropulse laser, periocular corticosteroid injection, and vitrectomy. Although conventional treatments are effective for some patients, persistent, refractory, and recurrent DME remains a clinical challenge that needs to be urgently addressed. In recent years, clinical studies have found that certain combination therapies are superior to monotherapy, which can not only restore the anatomical structure of the macular area and effectively reduce macular edema but also improve visual function to some extent while reducing the number of treatments and the overall cost. This makes up for the shortcomings of single treatment modalities and is highly anticipated in the clinical setting. However, the application of combination therapy in clinical practice is relatively short, and its safety and long-term effectiveness need further exploration. Currently, new drugs, new formulations, and new therapeutic targets are still under research and development to address different mechanisms of DME occurrence and development, such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents designed to anchor repetitive sequence proteins with stronger inhibition of vascular leakage, multiple growth factor inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, and stem cell therapy. With the continuous improvement of the combination application of existing drugs and treatments and the development of new drugs and treatment technologies, personalized treatment for DME will become possible.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare and analyze the application of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs for intravitreal injection in the real world before and after the establishment of one-stop intravitreal injection center, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of different management modes.Methods:A retrospective clinical study. A total of 4 015 patients (4 659 eyes) who received anti-VEGF drugs for ocular fundus diseases at the Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital from July, 2018 to June, 2022 were included in the study. There were 2 146 males and 1 869 females. The ocular fundus diseases in this study were as follows: 1 090 eyes of 968 patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD); 855 eyes of 654 patients with diabetic macular edema (DME); 1 158 eyes of 980 patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR); 930 eyes of 916 patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO-ME). A total of 294 eyes of 275 patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia (PM-CNV); 332 eyes of 222 patients with other fundus diseases. A total of 13 796 anti-VEGF needles were injected. A total of 1 252 patients (1 403 eyes) from July 2018 to June 2020 were regarded as the control group. From July 2020 to June 2022, 2 763 patients (3 256 eyes) who received anti-VEGF treatment in the intravitreal injection center were regarded as the observation group. The total number of intravitreal injection needles, the distribution of anti-VEGF therapy in each disease according to disease classification, the proportion of patients who chose the 3+ on-demand treatment (PRN) regimen and the distribution of clinical application of different anti-VEGF drugs were compared between the control group and the observation group. The waiting time and medical experience of patients were investigated by questionnaire. χ2 test was used to compare the count data between the two groups, and t test was used to compare the measurement data. Results:Among the 13 796 anti-VEGF injections in 4 659 eyes, the total number of anti-VEGF drugs used in the control and observation groups were 4 762 and 9 034, respectively, with an average of (3.39±3.78) and (2.78±2.27) injections per eye ( t=6.900, P<0.001), respectively. In the control and observation groups, a total of 1 728 and 2 705 injections of anti-VEGF drugs were used for wAMD with an average of (5.14±4.56) and (3.59±2.45) injections per eye, respectively; a total of 982 and 2 038 injections of anti-VEGF drugs were used for DME with an average of (4.36±4.91) and (3.24±2.77) needles per eye, respectively. Additionally, a total of 942 and 2 179 injections of anti-VEGF drugs were injected for RVO-ME with an average of (3.98±3.71) and (3.14±2.15) injections per eye, respectively; a total of 291 and 615 injections of anti-VEGF drugs were injected for PM-CNV with an average of (3.31±2.63) and (2.99±1.69) injections per eye, respectively. A total of 683 and 1 029 injections of anti-VEGF drugs were injected for DR with an average of (1.60±1.26) and (1.41±1.05) injections per eye, respectively. The clinical application and implementation of "3+PRN" treatment were as follows: 223 (66.4%, 223/336) and 431 eyes (57.2%, 431/754) in the wAMD ( χ2=8.210, P=0.004), 75 (33.3%, 75/225) and 236 (37.5%, 236/630) eyes in the DME ( χ2=1.220, P>0.05), and 97 (40.9%, 97/237) and 355 eyes (51.2%, 355/693) in the RVO-ME ( χ2=7.498, P=0.006), 39 (44.3%, 39/88) and 111 eyes (53.9%, 111/206) in the PM-CNV ( χ2=2.258, P>0.05), respectively. In addition, the results of the questionnaire survey showed that there were significant differences between the control and observation groups regarding the time of appointment waiting for surgery ( t=1.340), time from admission to entering the operating room on the day of injection ( t=2.780), time from completing preoperative treatment preparation to waiting for entering the operating room ( t=8.390), and time from admission to discharge ( t=6.060) ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The establishment of a one-stop intravitreal injection mode greatly improved work efficiency and increased the number of injections. At the same time, the compliance, waiting time, and overall medical experience of patients significantly improved under centralized management.
ABSTRACT
Intravitreal drug injection is a treatment for common chronic fundus diseases such as age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. The "14th Five-Year" National Eye Health Plan (2021-2025) recommends focusing on fundus diseases and improve the management mode of patients with chronic eye diseases. Therefore, it is imperative to explore how to further optimize the service process of intravitreal injection under the premise of guaranteeing patients' medical safety, to promote medical service efficiency and standardized management level and improve the medical experience of patients. Based on the quality control standard of vitreous cavity injection for retinopathy in China, Chinese fundus disease and related field experts developed the present expert consensus on the establishment of a one-stop intravitreal injection model and the management of its organization after a serious, comprehensive, and complete discussion, focusing on a standardized operation process, quality control, and safety management, providing more references for establishing a suitable intravitreal injection management model for ophthalmology and promoting the development of diagnostic and treatment models for fundus disease in China.
ABSTRACT
Background: Bevacizumab vials that are commercially available are fractionated into smaller quantities into the form of pre?filled syringes in a sterile and aseptic laboratory setting. Purpose: To share the long term experience of aliquoting of bevacizumab injections in a tertiary eye care center in India. Synopsis: Compounding of bevacizumab was found to be a cost?effective and sustainable practice that has benefited more patients with an affordable cost, while maintaining high levels of quality. Highlights: Compounding of bevacizumab, when done with aseptic precautions can be a safe and cost?effective practice, the benefits of which can be passed on to needful patients.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate contrast sensitivity in non-high-risk, treatment-naïve proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients treated with panretinal photocoagulation and intravitreal injections of ranibizumab) versus panretinal photocoagulation alone. Methods: Sixty eyes of 30 patients with bilateral proliferative diabetic retinopathy were randomized into two groups: one received panretinal photocoagulation and ranibizumab injections (study group), while the other received panretinal photocoagulation alone (control group). All eyes were treated with panretinal photocoagulation in three sessions according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study guidelines. Contrast sensitivity measurements were performed under photopic conditions (85 cd/m2) with the Visual Contrast Test Sensitivity 6500 chart, allowing for the evaluation of five spatial frequencies with sine wave grating charts: 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 cycles per degree (cpd). Outcomes were measured in contrast sensitivity threshold scores among and within groups, from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months. Results: Fifty-eight eyes (28 in the study group and 30 in the control group) reached the study endpoint. A comparative analysis of changes in contrast sensitivity between the groups showed significant differences mainly in low frequencies as follows: at month 1 in 1.5 cpd (p=0.001) and 3.0 cpd (p=0.04); at month 3 in 1.5 cpd (p=0.016), and at month 6 in 1.5 cpd (p=0.001) and 3.0 cpd (p=0.026) in favor of the study group. Conclusions: In eyes of patients with non-high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy, panretinal photocoagulation treatment with ranibizumab appears to cause less damage to contrast sensitivity compared with panretinal photocoagulation treatment alone. Thus, our evaluation of contrast sensitivity may support the use of ranabizumab as an adjuvant to panretinal photocoagulation for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
RESUMO Objetivos: Avaliar a sensibilidade ao contraste em pacientes virgens de tratamento com retinopatia diabética proliferativa de não alto risco, submetidos a panfotocoagulação retiniana com injeções intravítreas de ranibizumabe versus panfotocoagulação isolada. Métodos: Sessenta olhos de 30 pacientes foram randomizados em dois grupos: um submetido a panfotocoagulação com injeções de ranibizumabe (grupo estudo), e o outro submetimedo a panfotocoagulação isolada (grupo controle). Todos olhos foram tratados em 3 sessões de laser, seguindo recomendação do Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). Avaliação da sensibilidade ao contraste foi realizada sob condições fotópicas (85 cd/m2) com tabela Visual Contrast Test Sensitivity 6500, permitindo avaliação de cinco frequências espaciais medidas com redes senoidais: 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 e 18.0 ciclos por grau de ângulo visual (cpd). Foram realizadas medidas dos limiares de sensibilidade ao contraste intra e entre grupos na visita inicial, no 1º, 3º, e 6º mês de seguimento. Resultados: Cinquenta e oito olhos, 28 do grupo estudo e 30 do grupo controle, atingiram o término do estudo. Análise comparativa da SC entre os grupos mostrou diferença estatisticamente significante, nas baixas frequências espaciais, no 1º mês em 1.5 cpd (p=0,001) e 3.0 cpd (p=0,04), no 3º mês em 1.5 cpd (p=0,016) e no 6º mês em 3.0 cpd (p=0,026) a favor do grupo estudo. Conclusão: O tratamento com panfotocoagulação associada a injeção de ranibizumabe parece causar menos danos a sensibilidade ao contraste quando comparada com panfotocoagulação isolada em olhos com retinopatia diabética proliferativa de não alto risco. Dessa forma, os resultados apresentados podem justificar a associação do ranibizumabe à panfotocoagulação nestes pacientes.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM:To investigate the factors associated with short-term elevation of intraocular pressure(IOP)after conbercept intravitreal injection. <p>METHODS:This study was a clinical prospective observational study. It enrolled in 269 eyes of 269 patients who were diagnosed retinopathy, and all patients receive conbercept intravitreal injection. Among them, 143 were males and 126 were females. There were 201 cases of age-related macular degeneration(ARMD)and 68 cases of other retinopathy patients. The mean age was 62.86±11.74 years. Non-contact pneumatic tonometer was used to measure the IOP of the patients before, 10, 30min, 2 and 4h after injection. The group was divided according to the IOP elevation 10min after injection. The IOP elevation 10 mmHg and above was defined as the IOP elevation group, and the IOP elevation less than 10 mmHg was defined as the IOP stable group. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the differences between the two groups.<p>RESULTS:The average IOP of patients at 10, 30min, 2 and 4h after injection was 24.1, 20.2, 19.5 and 16.9 mmHg, respectively. The average IOP at each time point after injection was 6.7, 3.1, 1.7 and 0.5 mmHg higher than that before injection. Among them, 56 cases of increased IOP, 213 cases of stable IOP. There were no significant differences in age, best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), gender, eye side and disease type between two groups(all <i>P</i>>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the number of injection(<i>Z</i>=-4.389, <i>P</i>=0.012), IOP before injection and IOP at each time point after injection(<i>t</i>=-5.343, -10.467, -8.933, -6.124, -4.635, all <i>P</i><0.01). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that baseline IOP was positively correlated with IOP increase 10min after injection(<i>B</i>=-0.913, <i>OR</i>=0.521, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.211-0.694, <i>P</i>=0.011).<p>CONCLUSION: The higher the baseline IOP, the higher risk of elevated IOP after injection. The factor associated with a short-term increase in IOP after intravitreal injection of conbercept was baseline IOP. The number of injection may be another risk factor.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To observe the effect of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion macular edema(RVO-ME), and to apply Logistic regression analysis to screen the factors that affect the vision recovery of patients. <p>METHODS: A total of 106 patients(106 eyes)with retinal vein occlusion and macular edema who were treated in the ophthalmology clinic of our hospital from January 2018 to June 2019 were selected for the study. The clinical data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed and all were given 0.05mL ranibizumab. The monoclonal antibody was injected into the vitreous cavity of the affected eye, and the patients were followed up to observe the treatment effect. The patients were divided into good group and poor group according to the degree of vision recovery after 3mo of treatment, and the two-class Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the factors that affect the vision recovery of patients.<p>RESULTS: The Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution(LogMAR)of the affected eye at 1d, 1wk, 1, and 3mo after treatment was significantly lower than before treatment, and the macular foveal retinal thickness(CRT)was significantly lower than before treatment. The difference was statistically significant(all P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the average intraocular pressure of the affected eye before and after treatment(P>0.05). During and after the treatment, the patient did not develop complications such as endophthalmitis, increased intraocular pressure, lens opacity, and retinal detachment. Logistic regression analysis showed that there was no capillary perfusion in the foveal area of the macula and the center of the macula before treatment. Incomplete outer membrane and incomplete inner plexiform layer structure in the concave area are risk factors that affect the efficacy of ranibizumab injection. <p>CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion combined with macular edema is effective and safe in the short term. It can effectively reduce macular edema of the affected eye, improve vision, and normal intraocular pressure after treatment, and it is easy to operate and effective. It has the advantages of repeating, little damage to tissues, no obvious adverse reactions, less pain for patients, economical and practical. In addition, the lack of capillary perfusion in the foveal area of the macula before treatment, the incomplete outer membrane of the foveal area, and the incomplete structure of the inner plexiform layer are risk factors that affect the efficacy of ranibizumab in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion and macular edema.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the time of recovery to the respiratory baseline after treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and the possible influencing factors.Methods:The preterm infants with ROP who received ophthalmic treatment from January 2016 to December 2020 in the Department of Neonatology, Guangdong Women and Children′s Hospital were enrolled retrospectively.The baby who received vitreous injection were included in the injection group, and who received laser photocoagulation were included in the photocoagulation group.The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they returned to the respiratory baseline within 48 hours after ROP surgery.Relevant data were collected, including respiratory baseline, the respiratory status 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours, 5 days and 7 days after treatment, gestational age, birth weight, gender, corrected gestational age at surgery, weight at surgery, laser points, and treatment location.Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for continuous variables. Data were expressed as the number and percentage of patients for categorical variables, using Chi-square test or Fisher′ s exact test. Binary Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors.The time taken by preterm infants to return to the preoperative respiratory baseline after treatment and its influencing factors were analyzed. Results:A total of 386 ROP infants were included in this study.There were 157 infants who did not return to the respiratory baseline within 48 hours after treatment.No significant difference in the source, gender, gestational age, birth weight, corrected gestational age at surgery, weight at surgery, and respiratory pressure support required before surgery were found between the group who returned to the respiratory baseline within 48 hours and the group who did not (all P>0.05). However, there were significant differences in treatment methods and location between two groups (all P<0.01). The ratio of returning to the respiratory baseline in the group receiving intravitreal injection was significantly different from that in the group treated with laser therapy at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h after treatment (77% vs.14%, 82% vs.33%, 86% vs.58%, 89% vs.76%; all P<0.01). There was no difference in that ratio between two groups at 5 d and 7 d after treatment (91% vs.86%, 95% vs.92%; P>0.05). Of the 157 infants who did not return to the respiratory baseline within 48 hours after treatment, 108 cases (68.8%) required additional supplemental oxygen, whereas 153 cases (98.5%) required more intensive respiratory support ( P<0.001). According to the multivariate Logistic regression analysis results, the preterm infants who received laser therapy were less likely to return to the respiratory baseline within 48 hours than those who received intravitreal injection ( OR=0.099, 95% CI: 0.060-0.164). A small corrected gestational age at surgery was an independent risk factor for infants not returning to the respiratory baseline within 48 hours ( OR=1.147, 95% CI: 1.009-1.302). Conclusions:Infants with ROP who receive intravitreal injection can return to the respiratory baseline more quickly than those who underwent laser photo-coagulation under. The difference persisted up to 4 days. The smaller the corrected gestational age at treatment, the less likely return to the respiratory baseline within 48 hours in photocoagulation group..
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To observe the efficacy of aflibercept and ranibizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema(DME).<p>METHODS: Patients with DME who visited the ophthalmology department of Xingtai People's Hospital for the first time from November 2019 to February 2020 were included in the study. They were randomly divided into the aflibercept group and the ranibizumab group. 3+PRN(pro re nata)was used, and the interval time between two injections was at least 4wk. All patients were given three injections first. During follow-up, the patient's best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and central foveal thickness(CFT)were used to determine whether to inject again. All patients were followed-up for 12mo. The changes of BCVA, CFT, intraocular pressure and injection times were recorded in two groups before and after treatment.<p>RESULTS: During preoperative and postoperative follow-up, there were statistical differences in LogMAR BCVA and CFT of the two groups respectively(<i>P</i><0.05). The comparison between the two groups showed no statistical significance during the BCVA and the CFT follow-up(<i>P</i>>0.05). At the end of follow-up, there was a statistical difference in the number of injections between the two groups(<i>t</i>= -6.403, <i>P</i><0.05). The average number of injections was 6.094±0.689 in the aflibercept group and 7.231±0.652 in the ranibizumab group. No ocular complications or systemic adverse reactions occurred in all patients.<p>CONCLUSION: Compared with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and aflibercept for the treatment of DME can achieve similar treatment effect, but the number of injections is less in the aflibercept.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the safety and clinical effect of gene therapy for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON).Methods:A multi-center prospective non-randomized controlled trial was conducted.Eighty eyes of 40 LHON patients with mitochondrial DNA 11778 mutation were enrolled in Taihe Hospital from December 2017 to February 2018.Intravitreal injection of recombinant adeno associated virus 2-NADH dehydrogenase 4 (rAAV2- ND4) was carried out in the unilateral eye with worse visual acuity or the right eye (if the visual acuity of both eyes was equal) of each subject as the treated group and the fellow eyes as the untreated group.The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was detected using a standard logarithmic chart and intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with a non-contact tonometer before treatment and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after treatment.The manifestations of the ocular anterior segment and fundus were examined by slit lamp microscopy and color photography.The changes of visual acuity and IOP before and after gene therapy were compared, and complications were evaluated between the treated group and the untreated group.The effective rate defined as visual acuity improved ≥0.3 LogMAR at the end of follow-up was assessed.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and the study protocol was approved by an Ethics Committee of Taihe Hospital (No.201807). Written informed consent was obtained from each subject prior to any medical examination and treatment. Results:The visual acuity improved 6 eyes in the treated group and 4 eyes in the untreated group, and 13 patients showed bilateral improvement.The visual acuity improvement ≥0.3 LogMAR in 23 patients with the effective rate 57.5%.The BCVA was (1.51±0.62) LogMAR and (1.62±0.58) LogMAR at the end of following-up in the untreated group and treated group, respectively, which were significantly higher than (1.75±0.46) LogMAR and (1.83±0.47) LogMAR before treatment (both at P<0.01), and no significant difference was found in BCVA between the two groups ( Fgroup=0.084, P=0.772). There was no significant difference in IOP between the two groups before and after treatment ( Fgroup=0.557, P=0.575; Ftime=2.314, P=0.106). No serious complications were found in all subjects during following-up. Conclusions:rAAV2- ND4 gene therapy is safe and effective for LHON, and binocular vision can be improved by monocular intravitreal injection of rAAV2- ND4 gene.
ABSTRACT
Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is a common type of acute optic neuropathy in elderly, characterized by optic disc edema and visual field defect.At present, there is no generally accepted treatment, and the treatment of NAION is to control systemic disease and other risk factors, reduce optic disc edema, nurture nerve and improve microcirculation.In recent years, intravitreal drug injection has been used as a new therapy of NAION.It can make drug reach the target issue in the eye rapidly and maintain a relatively high concentration, which can enhance the efficacy without causing severe systemic complication.In this article, the effect of intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, triamcinolone acetonide, and erythropoietin in NAION was reviewed.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To compare the therapeutic effect of Ranibizumab on retinopathy of prematurity(ROP)with or without preretinal hemorrhage(PRH). <p>METHODS: From April 2017 to January 2018, a retrospective study was carried out on the diagnosed and treated ROP cases 66 eyes of 34 in the Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University. All the infants were divided into two groups according to PRH or not. All patients were treated with intravitreal Ranibizumab under tropical anesthesia. The infants were followed up, and the cure and retreatment rate between the two groups after initial treatment were compared. <p>RESULTS: After the initial treatment of intravitreal Ranibizumab, the cure rate was 65%(17)and 98%(39), and the retreatment rate was 35%(9)and 2%(1)in bleeding and non-bleeding group, respectively. 9 eyes with PRH needed retreatment; however, only 1 eye retreatment in the non-bleeding group. Notably, all the retreatment cases were cured by once more intravitreal Ranibizumab. The cure rate between two groups was statistically significant. <p>CONCLUSION: The curative effect with initial treatment of ROP with PRH was significantly lower than that without PRH. The retreatment cases were attenuated by repeated intravitreal Ranibizumab treatment.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of conbercept intravitreal injection combined with panretinal photocoagulation for ischemic central retinal vein occlusion.<p>METHODS: A retrospective study has been conducted on 80 patients(80 eyes)of ischemic central retinal vein occlusion diagnosed and treated at Dalian No.3 People's Hospital from January 2017 to January 2019. These 80 patients have been divided into two groups based on treatment methods. In Group A, 40 patients(40 eyes)were given 3+PRN intravitreal injection of conbercept combined with panretinal photocoagulation. In Group B, 40 patients(40 eyes)accepted the treatment of 3+PRN intravitreal injection with conbercept. The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and central macular thickness(CMT)before and after treatment were recorded respectively at 3mo, 6mo and 12mo, and the clinical effectiveness and adverse reactions were observed and documented.<p>RESULTS: After 12mo: In group A, BCVA improved from 1.05±0.58 to 0.41±0.37(<i>P</i><0.01).In group B, BCVA improved from 0.98±0.51 to 0.63±0.53(<i>P</i><0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups(<i>P</i>>0.05). In group A, CMT changed from 592.30±79.75μm to 260.08±86.23μm(<i>P</i><0.01). In group B, CMT changed from 604.98±81.73μm to 406.83±162.97μm(<i>P</i><0.01).CMT was better in Group A than Group B(<i>P</i><0.01). The mean number of injections in group A(3.15±0.43 times)and group B(3.83±1.06 times)was statistically significant(<i>P</i><0.01). During follow-up, no adverse events happened in Group A. Two patients were neovascular glaucoma after central retinal vein occlusion in Group B.<p>CONCLUSION:It is safe and effective to use intravitreal injection of conbercept to treat central retinal vein occlusion. Combining intravitreal injection of conbercept with panretinal photocoagulation can significantly improve BCVA, lead to further regression of macular edema and a more stabilized positive effect. It proves to reduce recurrence rate of the central retinal vein occlusion and decrease the chances of any complications.